Primary Caretaker as a Factor in Child Custody Disputes.
Often, when contemplating a child custody dispute, a parent may expect to be awarded custody of a child simply because that parent has spent more time raising or caring for the child. Depending on the circumstances, however, a court may or may not award custody to such a parent.
The New York Domestic Relations Law – which governs issues such as child custody, divorce, and other family law matters – contains the following language.
In all cases there shall be no prima facie right to the custody of the child in either parent, but the court shall determine solely what is for the best interest of the child, and what will best promote its welfare and happiness, and make award accordingly.
With this language, the New York Legislature has directed courts to award custody based on what the court believes to be in the best interests of the child. Courts consider all aspects of a child’s living arrangements and relations with parents when making custody decisions. The fact that one parent has acted as the primary caretaker of the child will certainly be taken into account. But a court will not award custody to either parent for this reason alone. This may seem unfair to some parents. But again, the court’s sole concern in custody determinations is the best interest of the child. Courts are not concerned with redressing grievances between parents, or compensating a parent for his or her investment in a child’s well-being.
If you are currently facing a child custody dispute, or are concerned that you may be facing one in the future, The Law Firm of VAUGHN & WEBER, PLLC is here to assist you. We are conveniently located in the heart of Nassau County, Long Island, at 393 Jericho Turnpike, Suite #208, Mineola, NY 11501. Call (516) 858-2620 to speak with a Family Law Attorney today!
*Contributions to the research and preparation of this blog were made by Jason Mays, J.D. (awaiting admission in NYS)
Recently, we have received several questions regarding prenuptial and separation agreements. The questions seem to focus on whether or not the agreements are binding. Primarily whether or not a court can decide to modify the terms of such agreements if they are deemed unfair. The truth of the matter is that these types of agreements are legal contracts. If executed in compliance of the required formalities, then these agreements are generally binding. Modifications to these agreements are permissible as long as both parties consent and follow the appropriate formalities for modifications. Courts, however, will tend not to modify the terms of such agreements unless there are extenuating circumstances. It is not an easy task to convince a judge to alter or void the terms of these marital agreements. One exception to this general conclusory statement is when the best interest of an involved child would dictate that the Court intervene and impose its will. These agreements are very intricate and the necessary terminology can be the difference in whether one of these marital agreements are valid and enforceable or possibly declared void and meaningless. As always, please call (516) 858-2620 to speak to a family law attorney!
Keep in Touch