Motor Vehicle Accident – Important Decision

On October 20, 2014, in Litigation, Personal Injury, by John A. Weber IV, ESQ.

cast-clipart-cast

 

An interesting decision was made in Cattan v. Sutton, 2014 Slip Op 05764 (8/13/14).  The case involved an automobile accident in which Defendant made a motion for summary judgment.  The full case can be read at the aforementioned site.  The ruling in this case points to the fact that a driver having the “right of way” does not necessarily mean that the driver is exempt from being a proximate cause of an accident.  The possibility exists that there can be more than one proximate cause of an accident.  It is important to note that a duty for each driver exists.  That duty is to see what there is to be seen through the proper use of the driver’s senses.  This duty exists even when the driver has the “right of way.”

This ruling is important in evaluating a personal injury case stemming from an automobile accident.  Just being injured by another driver who engaged in improper conduct on the road is not enough.  Comparative fault must be eliminated.  By doing so, a Plaintiff’s case is made stronger and the likelihood of success is increased.

As always, if you have been in an automobile accident and seek the assistance of an experienced attorney, please call The Law Firm of Vaughn & Weber, PLLC at (516) 858-2620 today to schedule a free consultation!

Share:

Real Estate Broker Loses Million Dollar Commission

On October 17, 2014, in Real Estate, by Robbie L. Vaughn, Esq.

$$$

Broker sought to recover commission or finder’s fee of $1,250,000.

A NY Broker, who was not registered or licensed as real estate broker in Florida, brought an action against the purchaser of real property in Florida seeking to recover a brokerage commission or finder’s fee of $1,250,000. Plaintiff alleged that it was the  procuring cause of Defendant’s $50 million real estate purchase and was entitled to a 2.5% commission.

It does appear that the Plaintiff was substantially involved with the location and procurement of the property. However, the Court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The Court found that Florida law applied, since the subject transaction involved Florida real estate owned by Florida entities and the broker seeking a commission performed acts in that jurisdiction. The Florida Real Estate Licensing Act prohibits a person from operating as a broker or sales associate without being the holder of a real estate broker’s license. Moreover, finders must also be licensed under Florida law.

Therefore, the Court found that neither the plaintiff nor the broker in question was registered or licensed as a real estate broker in Florida and that precluded payment of a commission.

HALSTEAD PROPERTY LLC, Plaintiff, v. THOR URBAN INVESTMENTS LLC, Defendant.

Share:

Important Decision for Automobile Accident Cases

On October 17, 2014, in Litigation, Personal Injury, by John A. Weber IV, ESQ.

auto accident image

 

In January of 2014, the Appellate Division affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant in Lee v. D. Daniels Contr., Ltd., 2014 NY Slip Op 00487.  This case centered around an interesting question, to wit, Does a parties conduct in furnishing the conditions for the accident also make that party a proximate cause of the accident?  Based on this decision the answer is surprisingly, not necessarily.  Causal relationships have everything to do with liability in personal injury cases.  This case also shows us that it is important to keep up with current case law in order to evaluate the likelihood of success for a particular matter.  Automobile accidents are very intricate and should be evaluated by an attorney.

As always, if you were involved in an automobile accident and want to speak with an experienced attorney, call The Law Firm of Vaughn & Weber, PLLC at (516) 858-2620 today!

Share:
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is Attorney Advertising. It does not form an attorney-client relationship. We are a debt relief agency and a law firm that helps people file for bankruptcy relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code – Title 11. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Proudly assisting residents of Long Island, Nassau county, Suffolk county, New York City, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx, Staten Island, Manhattan